University Faculty
of Canon Law
www.iuscangreg.itCIC1983CCEONorms outside the two CodesResponses of the Apostolic SeeParticular LawProper law / statutesSources of past lawJurisprudenceInternational TreatiesWebsitesLiteraturePeriodica de re canonicaBibliografia canonisticaSearch enginesLinklistSitemapProfessorsFamous professors from the 20th century
Jurisprudence of the Apostolic Signatura in contentious-administrative cases
 
 

Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura
Decretum definitivum of 24.03.2001, Prot. N. 30221/19 CA


Petitioner Rev.da X
Respondent Congregatio pro Institutis vitae consecratae et Societatibus vitae apostolicae
Object Iurium
coram Schotte
Content Decretum Congressus confirmandum esse.
Notes Cf. etiam prot. n. 30349/99 CA,
Cf. etiam prot. n. 24216/93 CA.
Cf. L’attività della Santa Sede 2001, p. 856.
Sources 
?
Legenda
 
Canons of the Code 1983
All the canons that are found in the in iure and in the in facto part of the decisions are reported in the sources.
The canons that constitute the main object of the decision or on which the decision sets out a principle of interpretation are reported in bold.
The canons of the 1983 Code are shown in italics:
- if they do not appear in the text of the decision but if the decision deals with them;
- if they correspond to canons of the 1917 Code, of which the decision (prior to 1983) deals.

Other sources
All the sources that are found in the in iure and in the in facto part of the decisions are reported.
CIC can. 57
Legal Summary
1. Recursus apud Signaturam Apostolicam adversus competentis Curiae Romanae Dicasterii silentium praesumptum (cf. can. 57) reiciendus est si obiectum eiusdem recursus incertum maneat et, quidquid est, terminus lege statutus ad recurrendum servatus non est.
Cf. maximae prot. n. 30221/99 CA – DC.
1. Il ricorso alla Segnatura Apostolica contro il silenzio presunto del competente Dicastero della Curia Romana (cf. can. 57) deve essere rigettato se l’oggetto del medesimo ricorso rimane incerto e, comunque, il termine stabilito dalla legge per ricorrere non è stato osservato.
Cf. massime prot. n. 30221/99 CA - DC.

Author of the legal summary (in Latin) and of the Italian version: © G. Paolo Montini