Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura
Declaratio of 09.08.1972, Prot. N. 3211/72 CA

Petitioner	Rev.dus X
Respondent	S. Congregatio pro Clericis
Object	Remotionis
Publication	Apoll 45 (1972) 402 Documenta recentiora circa rem matrimonialem et processualem I. II, Romae 1977. 1980, I, nn. 3172-3174 IC 14/28 (1974) 382 LE IV, n. 4079 Per 61 (1972) 695
Download
Translations	angl., Digest VIII, 1133-1134
Content	De termino a quo effectus suspensivi recursus.
Sources  ? Legenda   Canons of the Code 1983 All the canons that are found in the in iure and in the in facto part of the decisions are reported in the sources. The canons that constitute the main object of the decision or on which the decision sets out a principle of interpretation are reported in bold. The canons of the 1983 Code are shown in italics: - if they do not appear in the text of the decision but if the decision deals with them; - if they correspond to canons of the 1917 Code, of which the decision (prior to 1983) deals. Other sources All the sources that are found in the in iure and in the in facto part of the decisions are reported.	Normae Speciales artt. 104-107; art. 116
Legal Summary	1. Effectus suspensivus, si et quatenus debeatur, viget antequam in Congressu decernatur «utrum recursus admittendus sit ad disceptationem, an reiciendus quia manifeste ipse caret fundamento» (art. 116 Normarum Specialium): ad rem sufficit ipsa recursus propositione legitime facta (artt. 104-107 Normarum Specialium). 1. L’effetto sospensivo, se e per quanto previsto, vige prima che nel Congresso si decida «se il ricorso sia da ammettere alla discussione o da respingere perché manchi manifestamente di fondamento» (art. 116 Normae Speciales): allo scopo è sufficiente la semplice presentazione del ricorso legittimamente fatta (artt. 104-107 Normae Speciales).