University Faculty
of Canon Law
www.iuscangreg.itCIC1983CCEONorms outside the two CodesResponses of the Apostolic SeeParticular LawProper law / statutesSources of past lawJurisprudenceInternational TreatiesWebsitesLiteraturePeriodica de re canonicaBibliografia canonisticaSearch enginesLinklistSitemapProfessorsFamous professors from the 20th century
Jurisprudence of the Apostolic Signatura in contentious-administrative cases
 
 

Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura
Decretum Secretarii of 23.09.2014, Prot. N. 48877/14 CA


Petitioner Rev.dus X
Respondent Congregatio pro Clericis
Object Reductionis ecclesiae in usum profanum
Publication J 75 (2015) 246; W.L. Daniel, Ministerium Iustitiae II, 737-739
Download
Translations angl.: W.L. Daniel, Ministerium Iustitiae II, 737-739; J 75 (2015) 247
Content Recursus peremptus declaratur.
Sources 
?
Legenda
 
Canons of the Code 1983
All the canons that are found in the in iure and in the in facto part of the decisions are reported in the sources.
The canons that constitute the main object of the decision or on which the decision sets out a principle of interpretation are reported in bold.
The canons of the 1983 Code are shown in italics:
- if they do not appear in the text of the decision but if the decision deals with them;
- if they correspond to canons of the 1917 Code, of which the decision (prior to 1983) deals.

Other sources
All the sources that are found in the in iure and in the in facto part of the decisions are reported.
LP art. 78 § 1; art. 78 § 3
Legal Summary
1. Competenti Curiae Romanae Dicasterio atque Auctoritate ecclesiastica inferiore nihil animadvertentibus, recursus desertus declaratur quoties recurrens patefaciat se recursum prosequi nolle.1. Se il competente Dicastero della Curia Romana e l’Autorità ecclesiastica inferiore non osservano alcunché, il ricorso è dichiarato deserto tutte le volte che il ricorrente manifesta di non voler proseguire il ricorso.
 German - Spanish - French
Comments W.L. Daniel, «Brief Note on Abatement in limine in a Contentious-Administrative Trial», J 75 (2015) 248-252.

Author of the legal summary (in Latin) and of the Italian version: © G. Paolo Montini